But I think what's important about this debate is not written into any specific 'gotcha' on this, but asking the question: What about freedom of speech? Should we limit speech from people we find abhorrent? Should we limit racists from speaking? I don't want to be associated with those people, but I also don't want to limit their speech in any way in the sense that we tolerate boorish and uncivilised behavior because that's one of the things freedom requires: is that we allow people to be boorish and uncivilised, but that doesn't mean we approve of it.

In 2000 these legislators considered a hotel room tax hike (favored by Governor Paul Patton for helping expand the Dr. Paul's ophthalmology board is not officially recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). In October Paul blocked a bill that would provide $36 million in benefits for elderly and disabled refugees saying that he was concerned that it could be used to aid domestic terrorists.

A member of the Tea Party movement he describes himself as a "constitutional conservative" and a libertarian. In 2010 Paul ran as the Republican candidate for the United States Senate seat being vacated by retiring Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky beating Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson in the primary. As a supporter of the Tea Party movement he has been vocal in advocating for term limits a balanced budget amendment and the Read the Bills Act in addition to the widespread reduction of federal spending and taxation.